[Mulgara-general] firefox bug and server config
Gregg Reynolds
dev at mobileink.com
Wed Sep 9 15:17:16 UTC 2009
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Paul Gearon <gearon at ieee.org> wrote:
>
> At face value, I'm guessing you'd like the ability to parse and output
> Hijry dates (I'll stick to Hijri, since you have a specific need for
> it)? I'm also guessing you'd like these to be both comparable with
> each other and with xsd:dateTime? Are you expecting anything else?
>
> That probably covers it, but I'll have to check with the local Historians
to see what they might need. One thing I have seen come up is the need for
more flexibility in SPARQL w/r/t date comparisons. It only supports
xsd:DateTime comparisons, but historians often need to deal in grosser units
like years. See Exploring Historical RDF with
HEML<http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/1/000026.html>
.
> Since xsd:dateTime has a specific format
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#dateTime), so Hijri would need it's
> own datatype. That fine, as it's a valid SPARQL extension to do pretty
> much anything with datatypes that it doesn't define. So is there a
> common URI for Hijri?
>
> I'd be happy to work with you on this, so let me know what's needed
> and I'll look into it.
>
>
Fantastic! I'll look into it and get back to you with a
requirements/wishlist in a few weeks.
Thanks a mill,
gregg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mulgara.org/pipermail/mulgara-general/attachments/20090909/43e9f097/attachment.htm>
More information about the Mulgara-general
mailing list