[Mulgara-general] Mulgara Lite

[Life is hard, and then you die]

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:47:43PM -0500, Paul Gearon wrote:
> 
> Is there anyone out there using Mulgara-Lite? I'm under the impression
> that it is unused.

We used to use it, but haven't for a while. So as far as we're
concerned you can remove it.

> I want to create a "lite" distribution that is a little different to
> what this jar provides. Specifically, a distribution that contains
> ONLY Mulgara code (no jars embedded), and which skips all the network
> service code. In other words, it would be good for creating a Database
> object, but it wouldn't do RMI nor HTTP, and it would allow a calling
> framework to set up its own jars, rather than relying on having this
> built into the Mulgara jar (where there could be conflicts).
> 
> In the meantime, I'm building another similar package, only this one
> will have everything, including the network code.

Sounds good. However, how much is the network stuff, i.e. how is the
difference between the two jars? Having too many jars to choose from
is also annoying, so I would vote to only have two if the difference
in size is significant.


  Cheers,

  Ronald