[Mulgara-dev] Determining the minimal set of classes/jars
Edwin Shin
eddie at fedora-commons.org
Fri Jul 11 18:49:19 UTC 2008
On 11/27/2007 12:51 PM, Andrae Muys is rumored to have said:
>
> On 25/11/2007, at 5:45 PM, Edwin Shin wrote:
>
>>
>>> Couple of nits with embedded-dist: jid3.jar is included as a "core
>>> library" rather than third party, dtd-jar is listed twice in the
>>> dependencies of the target. I don't really understand what the ARP
>>> hack is supposed to be doing, so I left it in the core-dist as well.
>>
>> I forgot to mention that embedded-dist also includes client-jrdf-jar
>> as a dependency but doesn't include its contents when building the
>> dist jar.
>
> Edwin,
>
> Thanks for all this work. Unfortunately the maintenance of the build
> system fell mostly on Simon Raboczi's shoulders - he's just the right
> sort of crazy to enjoy tinkering with that sort of thing - and he has
> spent the past year and a bit distracted by his PhD, and before that the
> query-transformation code. As a result it's been a while since anyone
> sat down and looked closely at the way we're building Mulgara. I really
> do appreciate you taking the time to look at it. I'll apply the patch
> and, assuming no problems with the regression tests, apply it to trunk.
A bit of a blast from the past. I've just started working with Mulgara
2.0 and saw that the patches against 1.1.1 to add the new build target
were never incorporated.
I've updated the patch to work against the trunk (attached for
reference). If there are no objections, I'd like to go ahead and drop
this in.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: build.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 7351 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mulgara.org/pipermail/mulgara-dev/attachments/20080712/ea652e97/attachment.bin>
More information about the Mulgara-dev
mailing list