[Mulgara-general] New JTA support now considered beta - please test and report success/failure to the list.

Andrae Muys andrae at netymon.com
Mon Feb 11 11:56:56 UTC 2008


On 07/02/2008, at 4:08 PM, Andrae Muys wrote:
> On 07/02/2008, at 2:15 PM, Life is hard, and then you die wrote:
>> Using the mgr-73 branch, I'm getting a failed assertion doing
>> essentially
>>
>>   s1.setAutoCommit(false)
>>   insert/query
>>   s1.commit()
>>   s1.close()
>>
>>   s2.setAutoCommit(false)
>>
>> Shouldn't the session.close() reset things? (Note this not using
>> XAResource yet).
>
> Ok, looking at the transaction code with fresh eyes it is clear that
> I wasn't thinking clearly when I was managing the writeTransaction
> field.  This field was critically important in the pre-JTA code, as
> it was involved in tracking the holder of the write-lock.  Now it has
> been demoted to a reference to the holder to ensure the cleanup
> routines work correctly.

Found and fixed - an attempt to be extra paranoid about resetting the  
transaction state on session-close backfired when resetting the  
manager's state prevented the factory from resetting properly.   
Details in commit log - fixed in revision 639.

Andrae

-- 
Andrae Muys
andrae at netymon.com
Senior RDF/SemanticWeb Consultant
Netymon Pty Ltd





More information about the Mulgara-general mailing list