[Mulgara-general] Loading N3 fails

David Legg david.legg at searchevent.co.uk
Sun Dec 7 22:40:34 UTC 2008


Paul,

> I'm still curious about @has. It almost looks
> like it's complete syntactic sugar, with no consequence if it's
> ignored. Or am I wrong there?
>   

I believe 'has' is complete syntactic sugar.  The W3C primer on N3 [1] 
confirms it.

> Once I'm done, I hope to process the test files correctly.
>   

Good work, thanks.

David.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer



More information about the Mulgara-general mailing list