[Mulgara-general] Loading N3 fails
David Legg
david.legg at searchevent.co.uk
Sun Dec 7 22:40:34 UTC 2008
Paul,
> I'm still curious about @has. It almost looks
> like it's complete syntactic sugar, with no consequence if it's
> ignored. Or am I wrong there?
>
I believe 'has' is complete syntactic sugar. The W3C primer on N3 [1]
confirms it.
> Once I'm done, I hope to process the test files correctly.
>
Good work, thanks.
David.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer
More information about the Mulgara-general
mailing list