[Mulgara-dev] Migrating Feature Requests (the 8's and 9's).

Andrae Muys andrae at netymon.com
Tue Sep 12 06:26:03 UTC 2006


Below is a summary of the priority 8 and 9 feature requests from the  
kowari sourceforge site.  Could people please comment on

1. Is this feature already complete
2. Is this feature desired
3. What is the priority you place on this feature
4. Are you willing to be assigned this feature

I've included a template response below.

Please do not include the bug descriptions in your response.

I'll do the 7's in two parts over the next week or so.

--------
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? 
func=detail&aid=1251104&group_id=89874&atid=591707

[ 1251104 ] Remove Jena Support

Summary:
Remove Jena Support
Kowari's Jena support should be removed, to include RDQL queries.
This is because Jena is moving on to new versions which we do not
have the resources to properly support. Support for Jena was
originally put in place to allow easier migration to Kowari, which has
been acheived. Later migrations will be eased by support for the
SPARQL query language.

Note that Kowari will still need to include the Jena JAR in order to
make use of the Jena RDF/XML parser.

--------
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? 
func=detail&aid=1183507&group_id=89874&atid=591707

[ 1183507 ] Non-canonical server names fail for non-RMI

Summary:
Non-canonical server names fail for non-RMI
SOAP is currently demonstrating errors (refer to RFE: 1183505).
The first that usually shows up is because server name re-writing
does not happen when following the SOAP code path. Example
output:

--------
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? 
func=detail&aid=1111156&group_id=89874&atid=591707

[ 1111156 ] Improved client side API support

Summary:
  Improved client side API support
The client side APIs JRDF and Jena should offer the
same level of functionality as the server side
counterparts.

To do:
* Have JRDF pass all unit tests based on abstract tests.
* Have Jena pass all the same tests as server side version.

This mainly requires adding client/server blank node
support.

--------
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? 
func=detail&aid=938260&group_id=89874&atid=591707

[ 938260 ] Add HTTP interface

Summary:
  Add HTTP interface
Use Joseki as a template for the kind of support we
require. Investigate required implementation details
or just use the ideas demonstrated.

http://www.joseki.org/

--------
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? 
func=detail&aid=1252664&group_id=89874&atid=591707

[ 1252664 ] Add Rules for OWL Lite+ Support

  Add Rules for OWL Lite+ Support
Extend the new Rules Engine to support OWL Lite (at a minimum).

--------

[ 1251104 ] Remove Jena Support

1.
2.
3.
4.

[ 1183507 ] Non-canonical server names fail for non-RMI

1.
2.
3.
4.

[ 1111156 ] Improved client side API support

1.
2.
3.
4.

[ 938260 ] Add HTTP interface

1.
2.
3.
4.

[ 1252664 ] Add Rules for OWL Lite+ Support

1.
2.
3.
4.


-- 
Andrae Muys
andrae at netymon.com
Principal Kowari Consultant
Netymon Pty Ltd


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mulgara.org/pipermail/mulgara-dev/attachments/20060912/e60e56b5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Mulgara-dev mailing list